Tue, June 14, 2011
World > Americas > Osama bin Laden killed

Why Obama decided not to release bin Laden photos

2011-05-05 00:10:48 GMT2011-05-05 08:10:48(Beijing Time)  SINA.com

A drawing, released by the United State Department of Defense May 2, 2011, shows the compound that Osama bin Laden was killed in on Monday in Abbottabad, Pakistan. (REUTERS/Department of Defense/Handout)

It turns out they didn't plan for everything.

The operation to get Osama bin Laden was meticulously planned and carefully thought through, including the decision to bury the terrorist leader's body at sea--a move that would deny the Saudi a grave and, potentially a shrine.

But no one in the administration seems to have decided what should have been a pressing question: What about photos from the operation?

It came down to this: President Obama asked his advisers for a solid reason to release photographs of Osama bin Laden's dead body, according to sources close to the administration.

Nothing compelling came forth. The arguments against were clear: Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton consulted with allies in the Middle East and reported back that none thought the release of the photos would be in their interests.

She and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates also worried that the images would provoke anti-American violence at embassies, consulates and military bases overseas. The Muslim world might look askance at a desecrated dead body, even if it was Osama bin Laden's.

However, before the president's decision, CIA Director Leon Panetta had told NBC News that the image should be released.

Obama gave an insight into his thinking in an interview for CBS News's 60 Minutes. His words, relayed by White House press secretary Jay Carney on Wednesday, dismissed any release of photos of a dead Osama as "an incitement to violence."

The president also put the decision in the context of American values: "That's not who we are. We don't trot this stuff out as trophies."

Accounting for the morbid curiosity of human beings, there is little appetite, outside the media and some political elites, for the photos. The White House does not think that their release would bring psychological closure to the families of victims -- and this fact is derived from interviews with family members. Obama has plenty of cover from Congressional Republicans, many of whom have asked the White House to keep them secret.

One question remains to be answered: There are many things that a White House can't anticipate after events of this nature, but surely, at some point before bin Laden was killed, someone brought up the question of what to do with the photos that would be taken.

There is an argument to be made that Obama was correct to wait and see if a scenario developed where the release would advance the interests of national security.

No such scenario developed. So that's why the photos won't be released by the White House. Though the White House won't say it, not releasing the photos means that the images one associates with the death of bin Laden are those of Obama making the announcement and Obama and team waiting in the Situation Room. Not releasing the photos helps Obama own this event even more.

Now that the decision has been made not to release the photo of a dead bin Laden, presumably recognizable but severely wounded, the administration has taken a gamble.They've bet that the conspiracy theorists who don't believe in Osama's death won't be convinced anyway. In an age when everyone has photo editing software, why should they?

More importantly, the administration likely bet that the last image of bin Laden would be the most enduring--a grotesquerie, an Arab man--albeit a murderous one--felled by a western bullet. Is that really going to enhance America abroad? No, the president decided.

Of course, this may not be the last word. The decision's been made, but any decision can be revisited. (President Obama once vowed to close the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, too.) And it's always possible the photo could leak. It's not like we're in the old days where someone can destroy the negatives. If it's digital, it's fungible. If it's fungible, it can leak.

(Agencies)

| PRINT | RSS

Add Your Comments:

Your Name:
Your Country:
Comment:
(English Only)
 
Please read our Terms of Service. Messages that harass, abuse or threaten others; have obscene or otherwise objectionable content; have spam, commercial or advertising content or links may be removed.

SPECIAL COVERAGE

MOST VIEWED

LATEST VIDEO

PICTURE GALLERY